The Coils of the Anaconda: America's First Conventional Battle in Afghanistan (2024)

Related Papers

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN: Mujahideen Tactics in the Soviet-Afghan War

Аца Ранђеловић

View PDF

The Journal of Military History

The Bear Went Over the Mountain: Soviet Combat Tactics in Afghanistan

1999 •

Lester Grau

View PDF

Journal of Slavic Military Studies

Defeating Guerrilla Logistics: Soviet Operation ‘Trap’ in Western Afghanistan

2018 •

Lester Grau

View PDF

Asian Affairs, volume 45, issue 1, pp. 112 to 125

Afghan Stalemate: A Comparison of the Soviet and American Counterinsurgencies in Afghanistan

2014 •

Johanna Granville

Regardless of the invading state's aims, ideology, firepower, or population-centric "hearts and minds" strategies, counterinsurgency wars in Afghanistan always seem doomed to fail. The British (1839-1842, 1878-1880), Soviets (1979-1989) and Americans (2001-2013) have all underestimated the difficulties of waging war in this fiercely independent country. The plethora of books published on Afghanistan describing these difficulties fall roughly into four categories: archive-based historical studies, soldiers' war diaries, strategic analyses, and policymakers' memoirs. This article will assess three recently published books by an academic (Artemy Kalinovsky), a US government official (Dov Zakheim), and a US Marine combat veteran (Francis J. West), respectively.

View PDF

Al-Qaeda versus Najibullah: Revisiting the Role of Foreign Fighters in the Battles of Jalalabad and Khost, 1989–1992

Anne Stenersen

View PDF

Fighting the Insurgents' War in Afghanistan

Christopher Sims

View PDF

Military Technology

A Tale of Four Strategies: The War in Afghanistan

2010 •

John Antal

War is usually a complex, multi-sided contest and it is an even more extraordinarily complex to wage successful warfare in Afghanistan. With a resurgent Taliban taking over large areas of Afghanistan in 2007 to 2009, U.S., NATO and Afghan National Army forces have swung into action and are conducting operations in Helmand Province and other areas to deny the area to the Taliban and Al Qaeda and win public support. The area around Kandahar is next and Kandahar 1 is Afghanistan’s second largest city and the spiritual birthplace of the Taliban. The war, now in it’s 9th year, is nowhere near culmination. Most ‘experts” expect decades of fighting yet to come to the war-weary Afghans. The question that is asked by anyone seriously interested in military affairs is how will the war play out in the months and years to come?

View PDF

Unique features of US-led coalition during the Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, 2001.

Carolina Sclifos

This paper is about to explore one of the most important international operation in Afghanistan, a turnover of global community from unipolar world to a multipolar world, where United States is sharing power with other states and that is about to change the usual course of international relations from the beginning of 21st century. I will argue that intervention in Afghanistan is a typical model of multilateral implication, fact generated a high-level involvement, as well as difficulty in reaching a decision, due to the fact that each states is pursuing its own interests. Also I will argue about terrorism as unifying threat, which can make even ‘enemy’ states to cooperate between them, despite their opposed ideology. In this work I intend to describe that was unique during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, taking into consideration the alliance’s theories and specific features of the coalitions during this intervention. I will stress the main regional and strategic interests of U.S. and Russian Federation, which happened to cooperate during this operation- another individual fact that points the importance of the Operation Enduring Freedom. In conclusion I will argue that the main reason of this coalition was to counter the terrorism which proves the humanitarian concerns, taking into consideration the individual security over state’s security nowadays.

View PDF

Security science journal

In Afghanistan: Western and Soviet Methods of Counterinsurgency

2021 •

Lasha Tchantouridze

The two-decade-long U.S.-led military mission in Afghanistan ended in August 2021 after a chaotic departure of the NATO troops. Power in Kabul transferred back to the Taliban, the political force the United States and its allies tried to defeat. In its failure to achieve a lasting change, the Western mission in Afghanistan is similar to that of the Soviet Union in the 1980s. These two missions in Afghanistan had many things in common, specifically their unsuccessful counterinsurgency efforts. However, both managed to achieve limited success in their attempts to impose their style of governance on Afghanistan as well. The current study compares and contrasts some of the crucial aspects of counterinsurgency operations conducted by the Soviet and Western forces during their respective missions, such as special forces actions, propaganda activities, and dealing with crucial social issues. Interestingly, when the Soviets withdrew in 1988, they left Afghanistan worse off, but the US-backe...

View PDF
The Coils of the Anaconda: America's First Conventional Battle in Afghanistan (2024)

FAQs

What was the strategy of the Anaconda in Afghanistan? ›

The strategy was to have Afghan Pashtun militias launch an attack on the valley, similar to what had happened at Tora Bora. But this time, US special forces would be positioned in the eastern mountains to block any potential escape routes into Pakistan.

How many US soldiers died in Operation Anaconda? ›

Operation Anaconda offically ended on March 18, although there continued to be minor skirmishes in the region for the next month. During the operation, the coalition lost 15 killed and 82 wounded. the majority of the casualties were American, including 8 killed and 72 wounded.

What went wrong in Operation Anaconda? ›

The early frustrations of Anaconda were partly caused by events beyond the control of U.S. forces. Nevertheless, the U.S. joint command structure in Afghanistan was not well established, and the gears of U.S. joint force operations did not mesh well in the initial stages of the battle.

What was the point of operation of Anaconda? ›

Operation ANACONDA was a coalition military operation in Afghanistan aimed at eliminating al-Qaeda and Taliban forces in the Shah-i-Kot Valley. The coalition forces engaged in intense combat, facing well-entrenched terrorists who had holed up in the mountainous terrain.

What were the 3 main points of the Anaconda Plan? ›

The three main steps of the Anaconda Plan were 1) surround the Confederacy by sea and by land blockades, 2) take control of the Mississippi River to cut Confederate forces in two, and 3) ambush and surround the Confederacy and their capital.

What was Operation Anaconda America's first major battle in Afghanistan? ›

Well, it was America's first battle of the 21st century fought in the early half of March, 2002. It was the largest battle fought by U.S. troops in Afghanistan up to that point. Indeed, it was the largest battle fought by U.S. troops since Operation Desert Storm.

What killed the most soldiers? ›

But most of the deaths were from cold, frostbite, typhus, typhoid fever, pneumonia, and epidemic diarrhea. In the American Civil War, twice as many soldiers died of disease as from hostile action. In the Spanish–American War, nine times as many, largely from tropical diseases such as yellow fever.

What was the deadliest military operation in history? ›

By the end of Barbarossa, the largest, deadliest military operation in history, Germany had suffered close to 775,000 casualties. More than 800,000 Soviets had been killed, and an additional 6 million Soviet soldiers had been wounded or captured.

How many US soldiers were bitten by snakes in Vietnam? ›

The United States Archives and other sources suggest that between 25 and 50 American soldiers a year were bitten by snakes during the war in Vietnam. Some 10,786 American soldiers died of non-combat causes, including 9,107 by accidents and 938 due to illness. Snake bites were not specified.

How long was Operation Anaconda supposed to last? ›

Originally planned as a 3-day battle with light combat, Operation Anaconda turned out to be a 7-day battle with intense combat and was officially terminated only after 17 days.

What are the 7 principles of Mission Command Operation Anaconda? ›

The revised ADP 6-0 clarifies both the logic and the language we use. In this revision, mission command is the Army's approach to command and control, resting on seven principles: competence, trust, shared understanding, mission orders, commander's intent, disciplined initiative, and risk acceptance.

What is the thesis statement of Operation Anaconda? ›

Thesis Statement

Operation Anaconda highlights the complexities of modern warfare and the significance of applying Army Mission Command principles, as evidenced by the varying degrees of shared understanding, the effectiveness of mission orders, and the acceptance of risks by military leaders.

What is the point of anaconda? ›

Anaconda is often used by data scientists, statisticians, and researchers, who can use it to manage their dependencies, install and update packages, and manage environments easily.

Who was the commander of the Operation Anaconda? ›

Major General F.L. Hagenbeck, commander of the U.S. Army 10th Mountain Division, led the major effort to clean out remaining al-Qaeda fighters and their Taliban al lies in the Shah-i-Khot Valley.

What was the Anaconda battle plan? ›

Anaconda plan, military strategy proposed by Union General Winfield Scott early in the American Civil War. The plan called for a naval blockade of the Confederate littoral, a thrust down the Mississippi, and the strangulation of the South by Union land and naval forces.

What was the anaconda military strategy? ›

Anaconda plan, military strategy proposed by Union General Winfield Scott early in the American Civil War. The plan called for a naval blockade of the Confederate littoral, a thrust down the Mississippi, and the strangulation of the South by Union land and naval forces.

Which strategy was an important part of the Anaconda Plan? ›

The most famous plan developed in 1861 was General Winfield Scott's "Anaconda Plan" that called for a blockade of the South, followed by seizing control of the Mississippi River to split the Confederacy.

What was the snake war strategy? ›

It was proposed by General Winfield Scott. The plan called for the blockade of the Southern ports. Then an advance down the Mississippi River was to cut the South in two. Like the coils of an anaconda snake suffocating its victim, the south would be squeezed until it returned to the Union.

Was the Anaconda Plan a good strategy? ›

Ridiculed in the press as the "Anaconda Plan," after the South American snake that crushes its prey to death, this strategy ultimately proved successful. Although about 90 percent of Confederate ships were able to break through the blockade in 1861, this figure was cut to less than 15 percent a year later.

Top Articles
Abandoned Gas Station Cleanup Grant
Bustr Otter: Complete with ease | airSlate SignNow
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) Stock Price, News, Quote & History - Yahoo Finance
The Largest Banks - ​​How to Transfer Money With Only Card Number and CVV (2024)
Chatiw.ib
Here are all the MTV VMA winners, even the awards they announced during the ads
Think Of As Similar Crossword
Bed Bath And Body Works Hiring
Pollen Count Central Islip
Caresha Please Discount Code
Bestellung Ahrefs
Best Fare Finder Avanti
Identogo Brunswick Ga
What Time Chase Close Saturday
The Murdoch succession drama kicks off this week. Here's everything you need to know
House Of Budz Michigan
New Stores Coming To Canton Ohio 2022
Kürtçe Doğum Günü Sözleri
Spoilers: Impact 1000 Taping Results For 9/14/2023 - PWMania - Wrestling News
1773X To
U Break It Near Me
Axe Throwing Milford Nh
Hewn New Bedford
Culver's Flavor Of The Day Taylor Dr
Team C Lakewood
Homeaccess.stopandshop
Tire Plus Hunters Creek
Craigslist Efficiency For Rent Hialeah
Lcsc Skyward
Que Si Que Si Que No Que No Lyrics
Craigslist Neworleans
Domino's Delivery Pizza
Cl Bellingham
Fototour verlassener Fliegerhorst Schönwald [Lost Place Brandenburg]
2023 Fantasy Football Draft Guide: Rankings, cheat sheets and analysis
Puretalkusa.com/Amac
Cuckold Gonewildaudio
Sofia Franklyn Leaks
Tricare Dermatologists Near Me
Flappy Bird Cool Math Games
Babykeilani
Iman Fashion Clearance
UWPD investigating sharing of 'sensitive' photos, video of Wisconsin volleyball team
The Machine 2023 Showtimes Near Roxy Lebanon
Hughie Francis Foley – Marinermath
10 Best Tips To Implement Successful App Store Optimization in 2024
Craigslist Pet Phoenix
Assignation en paiement ou injonction de payer ?
Call2Recycle Sites At The Home Depot
Tyrone Dave Chappelle Show Gif
Zom 100 Mbti
Fahrpläne, Preise und Anbieter von Bookaway
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated:

Views: 6313

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.