MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (2024)

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (1)

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (2)

  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (3)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (4)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (5)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (6)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (7)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (8)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (9)
  • MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (10)
 

Preview

Filing # 96298167 E-Filed 09/25/2019 04:20:34 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2019-CA-2370 DIVISION: CV-H CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, an individual, Plaintiff, Vv. WE INSURE GROUP, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. / MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS — THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP, INC. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this Motion to Compel Production of Documents — Third and Fourth Requests for Production to We Insure Group, Inc., and states in support thereof: 1 On August 15, 2019 and August 16, 2019, Plaintiff served his Third and Fourth Requests for Production, respectively, on Defendant We Insure Group, Inc. (See Exhibits “A” and “B”). 2 On September 17, 2019, We Insure Group, Inc. responded by stating that it is only the holding company, and that any responsive documents would be in the custody and control of its subsidiary, We Insure, Inc. (See Composite Exhibit “C”). We Insure Group, Inc. made no objections to the two (2) requests. 3 As explained in the undersigned’s good faith letter dated September 19, 2019 (Exhibit “D”), We Insure Group, Inc., as the holding company for We Insure, Inc., is in Page 1 of 4ACCEPTED: DUVAL COUNTY, RONNIE FUSSELL, CLERK, 09/27/2019 09:08:19 AM.possession, custody and control of the documents requested and must produce same. 4. Control, for purposes of determining whether a party has possession, custody orcontrol of documents, is defined as not only possession, but the legal right to obtain the documentsrequested upon demand. Saewitz v. Saewitz, 79 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) citing Searock v.Stripling, 736 F. 2d 650 (11th Cir. 1984). Moreover, it is not unreasonable to require a parentcorporation that is engaged in litigation to produce records of its wholly owned subsidiary. AmHonda Motor Co. v. Votour, 435 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). 5 It is difficult to fathom how, as Defendant alleges, We Insure Group, Inc. does nothave possession, custody or control of the documents requested when: a) We Insure Group, Inc. and We Insure, Inc. are located in the same office suite at 3020 Hartley Road, Suite 300, Jacksonville, Florida 32257, where all of the company computers and files are maintained. To date, Defendant has failed to explain how We Insure Group, Inc. is not in possession of or in control or custody of the computers and files maintained in its own offices. b) We Insure Group, Inc. previously produced documents in response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production that it indicated were in the possession of We Insure, Inc., thereby demonstrating the ease by which it can obtain requested documents allegedly “from We Insure, Inc.”; c) The CEO of both companies, Phil Visali, testified that he can do whatever he wants with any company he owns. In other words, Mr. Visali can easily instruct an employee in the same office to obtain the requested documents. In fact, based upon the deposition of Salena Simpson, who gathered the documents for production and notably, who first testified she worked for We Insure Group, Inc. and then changed Page 2 of 4her testimony to We Insure, Inc. after prompting from Defendant’s counsel (See Exhibit “E”), it appears that this is exactly what occurred. We Insure Group, Inc’s position that it is not in control of the requested documents when its CEO can instruct someone to obtain the documents is disingenuous. d) Many of the documents requested are emails that that bear a weinsuregroup.com address. It is difficult to imagine how, in good faith, We Insure Group, Inc. can take the position that it is not in possession, control or custody of its very own emails. e) Regardless of whether it is We Insure Group, Inc. or We Insure, Inc. that ultimately produces documents, it will be the same person(s) gathering the requested documents. Many of the documents requested will originate from officers of We Insure Group, Inc., including but not limited to the CEO and CFO. 6 We Insure Group, Inc.’s refusal to produce documents is merely a means by whichto delay the discovery process as well as continue attempting to make a distinction between thetwo (2) companies in an effort to support its position that Plaintiff has sued the wrong party. 7 For all of the reasons above, there is no basis upon which to make a distinctionbetween the two (2) companies for purposes of discovery because We Insure Group, Inc. clearlyhas a legal right to obtain the documents and, being the parent company of and located in the verysame office as We Insure, Inc., We Insure Group, Inc. is in control of and in custody of therequested documents. 8 Plaintiff has incurred attorney fees and costs in having to seek Court interventionto obtain the requested documents. Plaintiff is entitled to the recovery of its attorney fees and costsassociated with having to file this Motion pursuant to Rule 1.380(a)(4). Page 3 of 4WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Christopher Salameh, respectfully requests that the Court enteran order compelling the immediate production of the documents requested in Plaintiff's Third andFourth Request for Production, for attorney fees and costs associated with bringing this Motion,and for any other and further relief this Court deems appropriate and just. Dated this 25" day of September 2019. FORD, MILLER & WAINER, P.A. ALP. Campbell Ford P. CAMPBELL FORD, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 0480495 cford@fordmiller.com ALISON BLAKE, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No.: 0584967 ablake@fordmiller.com 1835 3" Street North Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250 Telephone: (904) 390-1970 Fax: (904) 390-1975 serviceFMW@fordmiller.com Counsel for Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE THEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing document is being served on September 25, 2019via an automatic email generated by the Florida Court E-Filing Portal to: H. Leon Holbrook, III, Esquire Bethany R. Reichard, Esquire LIPPES, MATHIAS, WEXLER, FRIEDMAN LLP One Independent Drive, Suite 2301 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 hholbrook i eS.cOomM breichard@liy eS.COM rbrown@lippes.com Ipasquell: li eS.cOm Counsel for Defendant /L/P. Campbell Ford Page 4 of 4Filing # 94257884 E-Filed 08/15/2019 04:59:19 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2019-CA-2370 DIVISION: CV-H CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, an individual, Plaintiff, Vv. WE INSURE GROUP, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. / PLAINTIFF’S THIRD REQUEST TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, by and through his undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280 and 1.350, hereby requests the following documents and things be produced by Defendant, WE INSURE GROUP, INC, for inspection and copying by Plaintiff, at the offices of Ford, Miller, & Wainer, P.A., 1835 Third Street North, Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250, within thirty (30) days of service in accordance with the applicable Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Prior to incurring costs in excess of $100, please contact the undersigned in accordance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(3) and the comments thereto to discuss the scope and cost of production. INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS A. For the purpose of this Request for Production, you are instructed to produce not only the documents in your possession but of those in your agents or attorneys, and documents that are within your custody or control or are reasonably available. If you are only able to produce part of the documents requested in this Request for Production, state the reason why you are unable to produce the entire requested document. In the event you wish to assert "attorney/client privilege tt > ‘work product doctrine" or any other privileges to any documents requested herein, provide the legal and factual basis for such privilege or work product objection, and produce any and all documents that are not being objected. Also, indicate for each document listed on the privilege log the nature of the privilege claimed and the content of the document with sufficient clarity to support the claim of privilege. Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT "A"B. "Plaintiff" shall mean and refer to the Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, in the above- styled cause of action, and include all of its employees, agents, attorneys, or representatives. C. "You" and "Yours" shall mean and refer to the Defendant, WE INSURE GROUP, INC., in the above-styled cause of action, and include all of its agents, attorneys, or representatives, including but not limited to Philip Vasali. WE Insure Group, Inc. shall also include any other names by which the company has been known, including but not limited to WE Insure, Inc. D. "Defendant" shall mean WE INSURE GROUP, INC., in the above-styled cause of action, and include all of its agents, attorneys, or representatives, including but not limited to Philip Vasali. WE Insure Group, Inc. shall also include any other names by which the company has been known, including but not limited to WE Insure, Inc. E. The word "Document" shall mean any writing, recording, or photograph in your actual or constructive possession, custody, care or control (including documents which may be stored on electronic media such as floppy disks, hard drives, CD-ROMs or other media storage devices), which pertain directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, either to any of the subjects listed below or to any other matter relevant to the issues in this action, or which are themselves listed below as specific documents, including, but not limited to: correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, notes, messages, diaries, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, computer printouts, microfilms, video tapes or tape recordings. As to any data stored in electronic form, the person or entity responding to the request should furnish the information in native form. "Information items" as used here encompass individual documents and records (including associated metadata) whether on paper or film, as discrete "files" stored electronically, optically or magnetically or as a record within a database, archive or container file. The term should be read broadly to include e-mail, messaging, word processed documents, digital presentations and spreadsheets. G. Responsive electronically stored information (ESI) shall be produced in its native form, that is, in the form in which the information was customarily created, used and stored by the native application employed by the producing party in the ordinary course of business.H. Parties shall respond to each request for production by listing the Bates identifiers/ranges of responsive documents produced, and where an information item responsive to these discovery requests has been withheld or redacted on a claim that it is privileged, the producing party shall furnish a privilege log.I "Person" or "Entity", unless otherwise specified, means a natural person, firm, partnership, trust, estate, association, corporation, proprietorship, governmental body, governmental agency or commission or any other organization or entity.J. "Relate to" or "Relating To" shall be construed to include "refer to", "summarizes", "constitutes", "contains", "studies", "analyzes", "considers", "explains", "mentions", "shows", "discusses", "describes", "regarding", or "comments upon" and vice versa as it relates to said terms or phrases. When names are requested, names shall include the full name, together with the current address for such person. Page 2 of 6L. When addresses are requested, the address shall be the complete and current.M. Matters of Privilege. In the event you wish to assert "attorney/client privilege Won, > ‘work product doctrine" or any other privileges to any documents or communications requested by any of the following Interrogatories, then as to each document or communication subject to such assertion, you are requested to provide an identification of such document or communication with sufficient identification to include: the nature of the document or communication, the instigator or sender of said communication or document, the recipient or all of the parties involved in the production of said document or communication, the date, the name of each person to whom the original of said document was sent or may have been present at the time of said communication, a brief summary of the document or communication or its subject matter with sufficient detail to permit the Court to reach a determination in the event a Motion to Compel is required, and an indication of the basis for the assertion for said privilegeN. “Complaint” means the last filed Complaint by Plaintiff in this matter. “Salameh” shall mean and refer to Christopher Salameh.P. “Salameh’s agency” shall mean and refer to The Salameh Group LLC d/b/a WE Insure. “WE Insure Group, Inc.” shall also refer to any other names by which the company has been known, including but not limited to WE Insure, Inc.R. “Override payments” shall mean and refer to the payments/credits made by WE Insure Group, Inc. to Salameh and/or Salameh’s agency identified as “Orlando Territory” on the Agency Statements. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION All and any notices of default or demands to cure provided to Christopher Salameh that were sent in accordance with or pursuant to the standard territory management agreement. All and any written notice(s) of termination to Christopher Salameh from We Insure Group, Inc. or We Insure, Inc. All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails and texts, between Phil Vasali and Dominic Raices related to the payment or non-payment of the Orlando overrides to Christopher Salameh or his agency. All and any internal written communications, including but not limited to emails and texts, related to the payment or non-payment of the Orlando overrides to Christopher Salameh or his agency. Page 3 of 6All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, notes and memorandum with Lauren Franco related to the payment or non-payment of the Orlando overrides to Christopher Salameh or his agency. All and any internal notes or memorandums related to the payment or non-payment of the Orlando overrides to Christopher Salameh or his agency. All and any emails sent by Christopher Salameh to anyone at We Insure Group, Inc. or We Insure, Inc. from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019. All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Phil Vasali and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019. All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Dominic Raices and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.10 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Lauren Franco and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.11 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Corey Reigner and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.12 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Maria Aquino-Maghak and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.13. All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Jay Lerner and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.14 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Jay Wolfberg and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.15, All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Charles “Chuck” Bond and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019. Page 4 of 616. All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Gary Hallock and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.17 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Richard Hassad and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.18 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between Frank Lindine and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.19 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between any other Territory Manager and Christopher Salameh from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.20 All and any written communications, including but not limited to emails, texts, letters, and facsimiles, between anyone else at We Insure Group, Inc. or We Insure, Inc. and Christopher Salameh between January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019.21. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Maria Aquino — Maghak.22. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Charles “Chuck” Bond.23. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Gary Hallock.24. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Richard Hassad.25. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Jay Lerner.26. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Jay Wolfberg.27. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with Frank Lindine.28. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement with any other territory manager dated between January 1, 2016 through April 19, 2019. Page 5 of 6CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE THEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing document is being served on August 15, 2019 viaan automatic email generated by the Florida Court E-Filing Portal to: H. Leon Holbrook, II, Esquire LIPPES, MATHIAS, WEXLER, FRIEDMAN LLP One Independent Drive, Suite 2301 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 hholbrook i eS.com rbrown( it es.com Counsel for Defendant FORD, MILLER & WAINER, P.A. 4s/P. Campbell Ford P. CAMPBELL FORD, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No.: 0480495 ALISON BLAKE, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No.: 0584967 1835 N. Third Street Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250 904-390-1970 904-390-1975 (fax) cford@fordmiller.com, ablake@fordmiller.com serviceFMW@fordmiller.com Counsel for Plaintiff Page 6 of 6Filing # 94318608 E-Filed 08/16/2019 03:52:20 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2019-CA-2370 DIVISION: CV-H CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, an individual, Plaintiff, Vv. WE INSURE GROUP, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. / PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH REQUEST TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, by and through his undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280 and 1.350, hereby requests the following documents and things be produced by Defendant, WE INSURE GROUP, INC, for inspection and copying by Plaintiff, at the offices of Ford, Miller, & Wainer, P.A., 1835 Third Street North, Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250, within thirty (30) days of service in accordance with the applicable Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Prior to incurring costs in excess of $100, please contact the undersigned in accordance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(3) and the comments thereto to discuss the scope and cost of production. INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS A. For the purpose of this Request for Production, you are instructed to produce not only the documents in your possession but of those in your agents or attorneys, and documents that are within your custody or control or are reasonably available. If you are only able to produce part of the documents requested in this Request for Production, state the reason why you are unable to produce the entire requested document. In the event you wish to assert "attorney/client privilege tt > ‘work product doctrine" or any other privileges to any documents requested herein, provide the legal and factual basis for such privilege or work product objection, and produce any and all documents that are not being objected. Also, indicate for each document listed on the privilege log the nature of the privilege claimed and the content of the document with sufficient clarity to support the claim of privilege. Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT "B"B. "Plaintiff" shall mean and refer to the Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, in the above- styled cause of action, and include all of its employees, agents, attorneys, or representatives. C. "You" and "Yours" shall mean and refer to the Defendant, WE INSURE GROUP, INC., in the above-styled cause of action, and include all of its agents, attorneys, or representatives, including but not limited to Philip Vasali. WE Insure Group, Inc. shall also include any other names by which the company has been known, including but not limited to WE Insure, Inc. D. "Defendant" shall mean WE INSURE GROUP, INC., in the above-styled cause of action, and include all of its agents, attorneys, or representatives, including but not limited to Philip Vasali. WE Insure Group, Inc. shall also include any other names by which the company has been known, including but not limited to WE Insure, Inc. E. The word "Document" shall mean any writing, recording, or photograph in your actual or constructive possession, custody, care or control (including documents which may be stored on electronic media such as floppy disks, hard drives, CD-ROMs or other media storage devices), which pertain directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, either to any of the subjects listed below or to any other matter relevant to the issues in this action, or which are themselves listed below as specific documents, including, but not limited to: correspondence, e-mails, memoranda, notes, messages, diaries, minutes, books, reports, charts, ledgers, invoices, computer printouts, microfilms, video tapes or tape recordings. As to any data stored in electronic form, the person or entity responding to the request should furnish the information in native form. "Information items" as used here encompass individual documents and records (including associated metadata) whether on paper or film, as discrete "files" stored electronically, optically or magnetically or as a record within a database, archive or container file. The term should be read broadly to include e-mail, messaging, word processed documents, digital presentations and spreadsheets. G. Responsive electronically stored information (ESI) shall be produced in its native form, that is, in the form in which the information was customarily created, used and stored by the native application employed by the producing party in the ordinary course of business.H. Parties shall respond to each request for production by listing the Bates identifiers/ranges of responsive documents produced, and where an information item responsive to these discovery requests has been withheld or redacted on a claim that it is privileged, the producing party shall furnish a privilege log.I "Person" or "Entity", unless otherwise specified, means a natural person, firm, partnership, trust, estate, association, corporation, proprietorship, governmental body, governmental agency or commission or any other organization or entity.J. "Relate to" or "Relating To" shall be construed to include "refer to", "summarizes", "constitutes", "contains", "studies", "analyzes", "considers", "explains", "mentions", "shows", "discusses", "describes", "regarding", or "comments upon" and vice versa as it relates to said terms or phrases. When names are requested, names shall include the full name, together with the current address for such person. Page 2 of 5L. When addresses are requested, the address shall be the complete and current. M. Matters of Privilege. In the event you wish to assert "attorney/client privilege Won, > work product doctrine" or any other privileges to any documents or communications requested by any of the following Interrogatories, then as to each document or communication subject to such assertion, you are requested to provide an identification of such document or communication with sufficient identification to include: the nature of the document or communication, the instigator or sender of said communication or document, the recipient or all of the parties involved in the production of said document or communication, the date, the name of each person to whom the original of said document was sent or may have been present at the time of said communication, a brief summary of the document or communication or its subject matter with sufficient detail to permit the Court to reach a determination in the event a Motion to Compel is required, and an indication of the basis for the assertion for said privilege N. “Complaint” means the last filed Complaint by Plaintiff in this matter. “Salameh” shall mean and refer to Christopher Salameh. P. “Salameh’s agency” shall mean and refer to The Salameh Group LLC d/b/a WE Insure. “WE Insure Group, Inc.” shall also refer to any other names by which the company has been known, including but not limited to WE Insure, Inc. R. “Override payments” shall mean and refer to the payments/credits made by WE Insure Group, Inc. to Salameh and/or Salameh’s agency identified as “Orlando Territory” on the Agency Statements. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION 1 All and any response(s) to the email attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. 2. All and any notes for receivables purchased by Christopher Salameh and/or hisagency, including those related to offices 67, 72, and 108, as reflected on Exhibit “B”. 3 All and any documents related to the debt owed that resulted in monies being paidto Christopher Salameh and/or his agency for Note Payments, including but not limited to thosepaid for “67, 72, 108” as reflected on Exhibit “B”. 4. All and any expense reports or expense vouchers related to Christopher Salamehand/or his agency from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019. 5 All and any requests for reimbursem*nts for expenses related to or for ChristopherSalameh and/or his agency from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019. Page 3 of 56 All and any documents, including but not limited to internal communications anddocuments, related to seeking approval and/or the approval of any expenses sought forreimbursem*nt by Christopher Salameh and/or his agency from January 1, 2016 through April 30,2019. 7 All and any emails from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 related to thescheduling of any meetings between Christopher Salameh and any Territory Manager(s). 8 A copy of the form, as testified by Phil Visali, individually, used by the HumanResource Department (“HR”) when someone’s pay or title changes. 9 All and any forms requested in #8 above related to or completed on behalf ofChristopher Salameh. 10. All and any internal documents, including emails, texts, memos and notes, relatedto any reimbursem*nt sought by Christopher Salameh or his agency for expenses incurred fromJanuary 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019. ll. All and any documents or records from the HR Department reflecting any changesin Christopher Salameh’s employment, including but not limited to any titles held by him and/orany changes in pay. 12. The entire employment file for Christopher Salameh. 13. The entire franchisee file for Christopher Salameh and/or his agency. 13. All and any forms or other documents where Christopher Salameh signed off on oraffirmed his duties and responsibilities. 14. All and any documents where Christopher Salameh signed off or affirmed his roleas a territory manager for the Orlando territory from January 1, 2016 through April 30, 2019 15. All and any emails where Christopher Salameh signed off or affirmed his dutiesand responsibilities, as testified by Phil Visali, individually. 16. A copy of the Territory Manager Agreement for Frank Lindine. 17. If not already produced with the Territory Manager Agreements previouslyrequested, all and any stipulations to any Territory Manager Agreement from January 1, 2016through April 19, 2019. 18. All and any documents, including but not limited to purchase/sale agreements andclosing documents, related to or otherwise reflecting the sale of any territory by Phil Visali, astestified by Phil Visali, individually. Page 4 of 519. All and any copies of paychecks/paystubs or any other documents reflectingpayments made to Christopher Salameh and/or his agency from January 1, 2016 through April 30,2019. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE THEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing document is being served on August 16, 2019 viaan automatic email generated by the Florida Court E-Filing Portal to: H. Leon Holbrook, II, Esquire LIPPES, MATHIAS, WEXLER, FRIEDMAN LLP One Independent Drive, Suite 2301 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 hholbrook li eS.com rbrown( it eS.com Counsel for Defendant FORD, MILLER & WAINER, P.A. 4/P. Campbell Ford P. CAMPBELL FORD, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No.: 0480495 ALISON BLAKE, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No.: 0584967 1835 N. Third Street Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250 904-390-1970 904-390-1975 (fax) cford@fordmiller.com, ablake@fordmiller.com serviceFMW@fordmiller.com Counsel for Plaintiff Page 5 of 5é re | - lake From: Chris Salameh Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 2:34 PM To: Philip Visali Ce; Chris Salameh Subject: 2017 - CSA - PVI - MMU Good afternoon, VJust wanted to recap and get this finalized and approved. Per our discussions, please see below. etective Jan 1. 2017 - PVI— Philip Visali to receive .25% of the monthly gross commissions for all territories . (le. (f WE receive $800,000 in commissions in January, Phil receives $2000 on his next payroll) MMU — MMU to receive .25% of the corporate Territory to INCLUDE all agencies under CRP with the EXCEPTION of the Orlando territory offices below. Paid on Payroll. CSA —CSA to receive .25% of the corporate territory to INCLUDE all agencies under CRP with the EXCEPTION of the Orlando territory offices below. Paid on payroll. CSA —In exchange for the $125,000 note to CSA, CSA will receive ownership of the Orlando territory for 5 years with a 5% Override to be paid on agency statement office 102 and to include: Offices: 87 -L. Rodriguez 89—J. Hinkle 90-D. Chase 92-0. Vasquez 100 -N. Perez 112 —A. Gonzalez 113 -R. Rovira 114-4. Emling 118 -E, Wasinger 119 - H. Pecunia Counties: Volusia Lake Seminole Orange Polk Osceola CSA is NOT to receive any additional incentives for franchises sold within the owned Territory above the corp franchise incentive. After5 years, CSA-PVI to discuss option to renew at a reduced rate of 2% with territory ownership transferred back to We Insure Group. Corporate Sales Team Incentive (Daniel Tabak, Jenna Carlill, Jub Dakuginow) 2 Asa team They are required to write $105,000 in premium monthly 1BIT Us sah a Ghali EXHIBIT "A"pha * Upon accomplishing $105,000 in premium for PVI new business, a 5% commission will be paid out according to each members written premium.Can we get confirmation once everything has been coded properly and in place so | can announce MMU and CSA asCorporate Tm's, announce the corporate sales team incentive etc.Thank you!vs of SalesOffice (904) 288-8976 x4160Fax: (877) 430-2768:Chris.salameh@weinsuregroup.com We INSURE" iadtidersiatnn Waning This camad contans mlormation intended ofly fev the use of the diticrdnalar eau an above Hil teander ab thisIntended recipient of the enipla.ce nt responsible tor deliver ye to the intended reap My ahissemi publee on o1 geapy ing af th sat de ttett the ad is siiigtlypisbibited, [he sender does mot accept amy tespamnstbilers Yon an loss, diveuption at dam: APU Noxte ett 1, ruvan dr transmitted with 4 sel Hf you have nocned iso or Serr data oF ve wa at a contained ettur plese mandi oly monet us by return cma Pam Peet a Cea"; “aS Agency Statement We Insure Group, Inc. 3020 Hartley Road Ste. 300 WZ Jacksonville, FL 32257 Office Number 102 Statement Date Agency Name The Salameh Group, LLC 4/14/2017 a $13,255.42 Total $13,255.42 NEG fess WE CMS §(136.69) Additional Producer Fee §(75.00) WE IT Support $(295.63) SIF $(147.59) Prorata Share Errors & Ommissions $(207.61) Applied Rater $(80.63) National Advertising Fund $(397.66) Total Fees $(-2,340.81) a Rass Fee Travelers Comm. Paid to Salameh Ins. Grou; $[10.24) Fee Cordone University ${149.00) Credit Note Payments - 67, 72, 108 $1,644.39, Fee Epic Commission Checks (2 of 5) $(268,56) Credit NEFL Territory $354.50) Credit Orlando Territory $3,458.57 Total Fees $5,029.66 Gees, [BristolWest_Foremost $(0.90)1|Mercury $(137,78) Shared MVR Fees $(58.06) Total Fees ${-196.74) Direct Deposit $16,747.53 EXHIBIT "B"Filing # 95853949 E-Filed 09/17/2019 03:58:59 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 19-CA-2370 DIVISION: CV-H CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. WE INSURE GROUP, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. / DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S THIRD REQUEST TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT. SERVED ON AUGUST 15, 2019 The Defendant, WE INSURE GROUP, INC., by counsel, responds to the Plaintiff's Third Request to Produce Documents to Defendant and states as follows: 4 This Defendant does not have any of the records requested. 2 This Defendant is only a holding company. 3 The active corporation is We Insure, Inc., and to the extent the documents exist, they are in the custody and control of We Insure, Inc. LIPPES MATHJAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN H. LEON'HOLBROOK, Ill, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 319910 One Independent Drive, Suite 2301 Jacksonville, FL 32202 (904) 356-6311 (telephone) (904) 356-7330 (Facsimile) hholbrook@lippes.com — Primary rbrown@lippes.com - Secondary Attorneys for Defendant EXHIBIT "C"CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant to Rule 2.516, Fla.R.Jud.Admin., a true andcorrect copy of the foregoing has been electronically filed via the Florida E-Filing Portal,which will cause an electronic copy to be delivered to P. Campbell Ford, Esquire, on this (— | 7 day of September, 2019. ATTORNEYFiling # 95853949 E-Filed 09/17/2019 03:58:59 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, INAND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 19-CA-2370 DIVISION: CV-H CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. WE INSURE GROUP, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. / DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH REQUEST TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT SERVED ON AUGUST 16, 2019 The Defendant, WE INSURE GROUP, INC., by counsel, responds to the Plaintiffs Fourth Request to Produce Documents to Defendant and states as follows: 4 This Defendant does not have any of the records requested. 2 This Defendant is only a holding company. 3 The active corporation is We Insure, Inc., and to the extent the documents exist, they are in the custody and control of We Insure, Inc. LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN }

Related Contentin Duval County

Case

16-2024-CP-001619-AXXX-MA

Jun 03, 2024 |BEVERLY, THOMAS |16-2024-CP-001619-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-CP-001937-AXXX-MA

Jul 03, 2024 |BEVERLY, THOMAS |16-2024-CP-001937-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-CP-001977-AXXX-MA

Jul 08, 2024 |BEVERLY, THOMAS |16-2024-CP-001977-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-CP-001662-AXXX-MA

Jun 06, 2024 |BLAZS, KEVIN |16-2024-CP-001662-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-DR-001936-AXXX-MA

Apr 18, 2024 |Roberson, Eric |16-2024-DR-001936-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-CP-001527-AXXX-MA

May 24, 2024 |BEVERLY, THOMAS |16-2024-CP-001527-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-CP-001453-AXXX-MA

May 21, 2024 |BEVERLY, THOMAS |16-2024-CP-001453-AXXX-MA

Case

16-2024-CP-001448-AXXX-MA

May 17, 2024 |BLAZS, KEVIN |16-2024-CP-001448-AXXX-MA

Ruling

CITIBANK N.A. vs MARTINEZ

Aug 26, 2024 |CVSW2309112

CITIBANK N.A. VS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THECVSW2309112MARTINEZ PLEADINGS BY CITIBANK N.A.Tentative Ruling: This hearing has been vacated. Parties have entered into aConditional Settlement.

Ruling

DAIMLER TRUCK FINANCIAL SERVICES USA LLC VS SKY BENSON, ET AL.

Sep 06, 2024 |22BBCV00564

Case Number: 22BBCV00564 Hearing Date: September 6, 2024 Dept: NCB Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles North Central District Department B daimler truck financial services usa llc, Plaintiff, v. sky benson, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 22BBCV00564 Hearing Date: September 6, 2024 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Motion to vacate dismissal BACKGROUND A. Allegations Plaintiff Daimler Truck Financial Services USA, LLC (Plaintiff) alleges that on July 19, 2018, The Around The Clock Freightliner Group, LLC (Dealer) and Defendants Miller Transportation LLC and Sky Penson (Defendants) entered into a Conditional Sales Contract, under which Dealer agreed to sell to Defendants a 2016 Freightliner Cascadia 125. Plaintiff alleges that the vehicle was delivered to Defendants on July 19, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants were required to make 54 payments of $1,811.98 for the vehicle, commencing on September 2, 2018, but Defendants failed to pay the amounts. The complaint, filed May 2, 2023, alleges causes of action for: (1) breach of contract; (2) money had and received; and (3) breach of personal guaranty. B. Relevant Background and Motion on Calendar On May 2, 2023, the Court held an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution. The Court noted that there were no appearances by the parties. The Court ordered the complaint filed by Plaintiff on August 4, 2022 to be dismissed without prejudice. On July 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to vacate the dismissal. The Court is not in receipt of an opposition brief. DISCUSSION Plaintiff moves to set aside the dismissal, arguing that it was not aware that a dismissal had been entered in the action, it did not receive notice of the dismissal, and the Court continued to enter orders even after the dismissal had been entered. Plaintiff moves pursuant to the discretionary and mandatory prongs of CCP § 473(b) and the inherent power of the Court. The background of the procedural posture of the case is relevant: · On August 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed the complaint. · On October 18, 2022, the Court held an OSC re: Failure to File Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint. Plaintiffs counsel represented he was still trying to serve Defendants and the OSC was continued to January 3, 2023. · On January 3, 2023, the Court held an OSC re: Failure to File Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint. Plaintiffs counsel represented he was still trying to serve Defendants and the OSC was continued to March 28, 2023. · On March 28, 2023, the Court held an OSC re: Failure to File Proof of Service of the Summons and Complaint. No appearances were made. The Court set an OSC re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution for May 2, 2023 and mailed notice to Plaintiffs counsel. · On May 2, 2023, the Court held the OSC re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution and no appearances were made. The Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice and mailed notice to Plaintiffs counsel. · On August 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed an application for publication regarding Defendant Sky Benson. · On September 12, 2023, the Court signed the Order for Publication. · On November 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed Proof of Publication. · On February 26, 2024, Plaintiff submitted a request for entry of default against Defendants and a request for dismissal of Does 1-10. The requests were denied on the basis that the Court dismissed the case on May 2, 2023. Notices of the rejections were served on Plaintiffs counsel by mail on February 26, 2024. · On July 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed this motion. Plaintiff argues that the motion should be considered timely because the motion was filed within 6 months of the actual dismissal of the case. Plaintiff argues that while the docket reflects that dismissal was entered on May 2, 2023, the Court nevertheless signed the Order for Publication on September 12, 2023 and did not reject the application for publication on the basis that the action had been dismissed. Plaintiff argues that the first time it became aware of the dismissal was on February 26, 2024, when its request for default of Defendant and request for dismissal of Does 1-10 were rejected on the basis that the action had been dismissed. Plaintiffs counsel E. Richard McGuire states in his declaration that prior counsel Michael Primack appeared at the January 1 hearing and marked it as concluded such that no further hearing was noted. (McGuire Decl., ¶3.) (The Court notes that there were no hearings conducted on January 1, a holiday, in this action and assumes this was a typographical error that should have referred to January 3, 2023.) He states that Mr. Primack left the firm less than a month after the hearing and that many files were incorrectly noted such that follow-up hearings were not scheduled. (Id., ¶4.) He states that he did not receive any notice of the continued hearing date, notice for his firms failure to appear at the March hearing, and notice of the dismissal of the action. (Id., ¶¶5-7, 13-14.) He states that Plaintiff submitted the application for publication on August 30, 2023, which the Court entered on September 12, 2023; Plaintiff paid the fees and had the summons published; and Plaintiff filed the proof of publicationnone of these documents were rejected on the basis that the action had been dismissed. (Id., ¶¶8-11.) He states it was only after the Court rejected Plaintiffs default package on February 26, 2024 that Plaintiff became aware of the dismissal. (Id., ¶¶12, 15.) Based on the date of the entry of dismissal on May 2, 2023, the motion to vacate pursuant to CCP § 473(b) is untimely as the motion was filed over a year after the dismissal was entered. Although Plaintiff argues that the date of the dismissal should be February 26, 2024 (as opposed to May 2, 2023), the Court declines to change the dismissal date. Here, proper notice of the OSC hearings were provided to Plaintiffs counsel and Plaintiffs counsels firm did not attend the May 2, 2023 OSC hearing when the dismissal was entered. As such, the motion brought pursuant to CCP § 473(b) is denied on the basis that the motion was not timely filed. (Thompson v. Vallembois (1963) 216 Cal. App. 2d 21, 24 [finding that the Court lacked jurisdiction to grant relief under CCP § 473 after the six-month period].) Nevertheless, the Court will grant relief pursuant to CCP § 473(d). Subsection (d) states: The court may, upon motion of the injured party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order. Here, while the dismissal was entered on May 2, 2023, the Court accepted Plaintiffs submissions and entered an order in favor of Plaintiff regarding service by publication and Plaintiff, relying on such orders continued to incur fees, pursued service of the summons and complaint by publication, and requested default against Defendants. It was not until February 26, 2024 that the procedural postures of the case was correctly noted by the court staff and Plaintiffs 2024 submissions were rejected. This is an unusual circ*mstance and the Court will set aside the dismissal to allow Plaintiff to pursue this action on its merits. The motion to set aside the dismissal is granted pursuant to CCP § 473(d). CONCLUSION AND ORDER Plaintiff Daimler Truck Financial Services USA, LLCs motion to vacate the dismissal is granted. Plaintiff should resubmit the request for entry of default and request for dismissal. The Court sets a Case Management Conference for January 2, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. Plaintiff shall provide notice of this order. DATED: September 6, 2024 ___________________________ John J. Kralik Judge of the Superior Court

Ruling

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION vs SIMON

Aug 31, 2024 |CVMV2304613

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT MOTION TO COMPEL BY NAVYCVMV2304613UNION vs SIMON FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONTentative Ruling: Granted.Defendant is ordered to serve full and complete responses, without objections, to Plaintiff’s FirstSet of Form Interrogatories, and to pay monetary sanctions of $361.65 to Plaintiff all within 30days.

Ruling

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS LLC vs. KENNETH HERNDON

Aug 28, 2024 |24CV13602

No appearances necessary. This case is at issue but neither party has filed a Case Management Conference statement in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.740(c)(2). Parties are admonished that the failure to file a Case Management Statement constitutes a violation of CRC rules 3.712-3.715 and 3.721-3.730 and Local Court Rules, Rule 8.05 and 8.06, and subjects the party failing to comply to the imposition of sanctions. The matter is continued for further case management and trial setting to November 13, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Updated CMC Statements must be filed and served at least 15 days prior to the CMC.

Ruling

Wells Fargo Bank National Association vs. First Western Financial Inc

Aug 26, 2024 |Unlimited Civil (Other Promissory Note/Collect...) |34-2013-00150544-CU-CL-GDS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO34-2013-00150544-CU-CL-GDS: Wells Fargo Bank National Association vs. First Western Financial Inc 08/27/2024 Hearing on Motion for Order Correcting Application for a Renewal of Judgment in Department 54Tentative RulingPlaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, National Association’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for order amendingthe application for and renewal of judgment is UNOPPOSED and GRANTED.On May 20, 2024, this Court entered an Application for a Renewal of Judgment (the“Renewal of Judgment”) against defendant First Western Financial, Inc., a corporation,and Mervin Ezray aka Mervin L. Ezray (collectively, “Defendants”) in the sum of$89,978.05. Plaintiff moves to amend the Renewal of Judgment nunc pro tunc toinstead reflect the sum of $80,978.05, as Plaintiff’s attorney of record mistakenly addeda “9” instead of a “0”.Plaintiff’s motion invokes the inherent power of a court to vacate and correct itsjudgments, which because of clerical error are improvidently or inadvertently made, aswell as the power under section 473 [and 187] of the Code of Civil Procedure to correctclerical errors, and to vacate judgments as the result of accident, surprise andexcusable neglect on the part of the parties or their counsel. (Bastajian v. Brown (1941)19 Cal.2d 209, 214.) It bears noting that this statutory authority codifies the court’sinherent power “‘after final judgment, and regardless of lapse of time, to correct clericalerrors or misprisions in its records, whether made by the clerk, counsel or the courtit*elf, so the records will conform to and speak the truth.’“ (Ames v. Paley (2001) 89Cal.App.4th 668, 672; Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co. (1935) 8 Cal.App.2d 54, 59-60.)Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.The Court will sign the Amended Judgment submitted with the moving papers.NOTICE:Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must complywith the following procedure:To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Law and Motion Oral ArgumentRequest Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At thetime of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message: a) identifying themselves asthe party requesting oral argument; b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oralargument; and c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing partymay appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below. If no request for oral argument is made,the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court. Page 1 of 2 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO34-2013-00150544-CU-CL-GDS: Wells Fargo Bank National Association vs. First Western Financial Inc 08/27/2024 Hearing on Motion for Order Correcting Application for a Renewal of Judgment in Department 54Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by videoconference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties inaccordance with Code of Civil Procedure 367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court willpresume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings. The Department 53/54 Zoom Link ishttps://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept53.54 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 161 4650 6749. To appear onZoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALLAPPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED.Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their ownexpense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements forrequesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the SacramentoSuperior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court-Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Temporeavailable at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-13.PdfA Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party,the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s ApprovedOfficial Reporter Pro Tempore list.Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests acourt reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and itmust be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an officialreporter will be provided. Page 2 of 2

Ruling

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC vs. JOHN ALCARAZ

Aug 28, 2024 |24CV13600

No appearances necessary. This is a collections case, as defined in Rule 3.740 of the California Rules of Court, filed on February 29, 2024. A proof of service is filed. Plaintiff must obtain default judgment within 360 days of filing the complaint (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.740(f)). Alternatively, Plaintiff is to file a Notice of Conditional Settlement of Entire Case as Defendant’s CMC statement indicates that the parties have come to a payment agreement. This matter is continued for further CMC to February 26, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept 3.

Ruling

LVNV Funding LLC vs. Verhaeg

Aug 26, 2024 |23CVG-00502

LVNV FUNDING LLC VS. VERHAEGCase Number: 23CVG-00502This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of default. The Court notes that Plaintiff submitted a defaultpacket that was returned by the clerk on August 5, 2024 because the application was not filed by fax and did notcontain an original signature. To allow time for cure of these defects, the matter is continued to Monday, October28, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for review regarding status of default. No appearance is necessary ontoday’s calendar.

Ruling

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. vs. Strike First Snipers LLC, et al.

Aug 29, 2024 |22CVG-01048

AL.Case Number: 22CVG-01048Tentative Ruling on Application for Judgment Debtor Examination: Petitioner CreditorsAdjustment Bureau, Inc. seeks an Order for Appearance and Examination of Kelli Hayward,President of Strike First Enterprises, LLC. Code of Civil Procedure section 708.110(d) requirespersonal service to be made on the judgment debtor at least thirty calendar days prior to theexamination. No Proof of Personal Service of the Application and Order for Appearance andExamination on judgment debtor has been filed. The debtor examination shall not proceed. TheApplication for Debtor Examination is DENIED and the Order for Appearance is VACATED.

Document

Shelly Kennedy VS Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Aug 29, 2024 |16-2024-CA-004786-AXXX-MA

Document

Bank Of America N A VS Joel R Yates et al.

Aug 29, 2024 |TCN-2161

Document

NAKIA BRADLEY vs ARIAN HODO

Apr 17, 2024 |NORTON, VIRGINIA B. |16-2024-CA-002054-AXXX-MA

Document

Casey Devon Norris VS Leroy Wayne Murphy et al.

Aug 30, 2024 |TCN-2589

Document

NEWREZ LLC DBA SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING vs HIRAM B WRIGHT

May 29, 2024 |FORECLOSURE JUDGE, |16-2024-CA-002950-AXXX-MA

Document

APRIL LANE VS JACKSONVILLE AVENUES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al.

Aug 28, 2024 |TCN-1210

Document

EAN SERVICES LLC vs SPECTRUM INSTALLATION INC

May 22, 2024 |DEARING, KATIE L |16-2024-CA-002782-AXXX-MA

Document

Fields, Pairys vs. RPC, Inc.

Aug 23, 2024 |16-2024-CA-004698-AXXX-MA

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -THIRD AND FOURTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO WE INSURE GROUP INC September 25, 2019 (2024)
Top Articles
Best Mashed Potatoes Recipe
Creamy Lemon Chicken Piccata - The Recipe Critic
12 Beginner Tips for Raid: Shadow Legends
Haul auf deutsch: Was ist das? Übersetzung, Bedeutung, Erklärung - Bedeutung Online
Krdo Weather Closures
Het Musculoskeletal Clinical Translation Framework - FysioLearning
Urbfsdreamgirl
2167+ Unique Pieces of Authentic Mid Century Modern Furniture In Stock - furniture - by dealer - sale - craigslist
Random Animal Hybrid Generator Wheel
What Auto Parts Stores Are Open
Yogabella Babysitter
Does Publix Pharmacy Accept Sunshine Health
Milk And Mocha Bear Gifs
Faotp Meaning In Text
Making a Docker Container Use a VPN – Natural Born Coder
Fintechzoommortgagecalculator.live Hours
Southpaws Grill Menu
Dyi Urban Dictionary
Worlds Hardest Game Tyrone
The Quiet Girl Showtimes Near Amc Shirlington 7
Sodexo Northern Portal
New Jersey Map | Map of New Jersey | NJ Map
How to Be an Extra in a Movie (and What to Expect)
Ihub Fnma Message Board
The Front Porch Self Service
Hannah Palmer Listal
Drys Pharmacy
Craigslist St. Paul
Telegram Voyeur
Espn College Basketball Scores
Fortnite Fap Hero
Provo Craigslist
3962 Winfield Rd, Boynton Beach, FL 33436 - MLS RX-11020379 - Coldwell Banker
Oklahoma Scratch Off Remaining Prizes
Camila Arujo Leaks
Krunker.io . Online Games . BrightestGames.com
Seller Feedback
No Good Dirty Scoundrel Crossword
Expend4bles | Rotten Tomatoes
Booknet.com Contract Marriage 2
Rubmd.com.louisville
Cvs On 30Th And Fowler
Hooda Math—Games, Features, and Benefits — Mashup Math
How Big is a 4×6 Photo?(Inch, cm, mm, Ft, Pixels) - PhotographyAxis
Jefferey Dahmer Autopsy Photos
Thirza (tier-sa) Caldwell on LinkedIn: #choosewell #orlandohealth
June 21 2019 Algebra 2 Regents Answers
Albertville Memorial Funeral Home Obituaries
Was genau ist eine pillow princess?
Al Horford House Brookline
Dl 9672
Dom Perignon Sam's Club
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 6070

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.